#Araxis merge or beyond compare 3 how to#
#Araxis merge or beyond compare 3 software#
#Araxis merge or beyond compare 3 code#

#Araxis merge or beyond compare 3 code#

I do need three-way comparison and merge.Ĭurrently considering Beyond Compare, Araxis Merge, and devart Code Compare.

#Araxis merge or beyond compare 3 software#

Also the larger config file (30k lines or so) caused some performance issues.Īnybody have recommendations for better diff/compare/merge software that works well on Fortinet config files, especially when sections or elements are in different orders? I'd also be using it for C/C++, C#, Java, Lua, XML, JSON, Python, text, and more. It worked okay, but I ran into many cases where a change in the order of entries confused it and I had to do those parts by hand to get a correct merge. Used UltraCompare to do the diff compare and merge. Pulled configs with scp and merged required parts into the new gates' configs. Just finishing upgrading a few older FortiGates to newer models.

Sharing dumps violates a reddit global rule and may result in a site-wide ban.

Posting brain or answer dumps for Fortinet certifications is prohibited as they are copyrighted material.

What you have already tried as part of your troubleshooting process.

Version and type of software being impacted (i.e.

Some examples of useful information are the following: Next, please provide us as much information about your problem as you possibly can. If you're having a problem with a Fortinet product, first, make sure you submit your request to Fortinet TAC if you have a valid support contract.

Here you can ask for help, share tips and tricks, and discuss anything related to Fortinet and Fortinet Products. The file types I typically deal with are going to be video and image media (imagine a post production house) so I'm compareing file sizes, date created, file name, etc.Fortinet is a global leader and innovator in Network Security. What if it was setup with Three columns, the far Left column could move 'right' to Center, The Center Column could move Right or Left, and the far Right column could move Left, then you could just re-arrange which column was 'center' through a 'swap sides' type button(s) I could imagine trying to develop a 'Move Left' or 'Move Right' control structure could be a challenge. Right now when I compare files between Dev and Test, and then Test and Production, I have to do 2 seperate sweeps, if I had a '3 way' folder compare, basically 3 compare windows, 1 for each tier, this would allow me to compare contents, and then move contents as appropriate between tiers. We match the folder structure across all three storage tiers for simplified navigation. we process and test in Dev, store our test files in another teir (test), and publish our live files into Production. Due to the nature of our storage SAN (muliple petabytes) we have files split across 3 seperate physical disk systems. We have 3 seperate processing folders, for the sake of this discussion I'll call them Dev, Test, and Production. The user needs the ability to freely edit all parts of the compare without analyzing differences and trying to merge them. In such a scenario, a three-way merge is useless (or would be cumbersome at best). By nature, the three folders may need to remain unique with changes made to each folder that are specific to the system they are being applied to.

#Araxis merge or beyond compare 3 how to#

At some future date, the changes implemented in both branches of the source code may need to be merged back into one common set of source files.Ī three-way folder compare would be useful when you simply want to see how files differ between computers 1 and 2 to get an idea of how to modify the files for computer 3. A 3-way file compare would allow the user to freely edit all three files and copy data back and forth between all three of them.Ī three-way folder merge would be similar in that it would identify changes in two sets of files and folders branched from a common ancestor, attempt to apply the combined set of changes from both sets of files into a new set of files in the output location (whether that location be a new folder, or one side of the folder compare into which changes from the other side will be merged in.)Ī three-way folder merge would be useful in a version control scenario where the code base for a product is branched, and a separate set of enhancements (or defect fixes) are developed in each branch of the source code. There is no output file in a 3-way file compare. The difference is that a 3-way file merge analyzes the input files to create an output file with the combined differences.

BC3 does not currently support a 3-way file compare. Just to be sure that I understand, what exactly do you mean by 3-way folder merge?A 3-way merge detects changes that have occurred in two sets of objects branched from some common ancestor, and merges them together to create a third set of objects that contain both sets of changes (alternately, the set of changes from one side is merged into the other side so that the other side contains all of the changes.)īC3 currently supports a 3-way file merge.